Productivity and creativity are the true source of personal
satisfaction. Freedom, and not dependency, provides the environment
needed to achieve these goals. Government cannot do this for us; it only
gets in the way. When the government gets involved, the goal becomes a
bailout or a subsidy and these cannot provide a sense of personal
achievement.
Achieving legislative power and political
influence should not be our goal. Most of the change, if it is to come,
will not come from the politicians, but rather from individuals, family,
friends, intellectual leaders and our religious institutions. The
solution can only come from rejecting the use of coercion, compulsion,
government commands, and aggressive force, to mold social and economic
behavior. Without accepting these restraints, inevitably the consensus
will be to allow the government to mandate economic equality and
obedience to the politicians who gain power and promote an environment
that smothers the freedoms of everyone. It is then that the responsible
individuals who seek excellence and self-esteem by being self-reliance
and productive, become the true victims.
What are the greatest dangers that the American people face today and impede the goal of a free society? There are five.
1. The continuous attack on our civil liberties which threatens the
rule of law and our ability to resist the onrush of tyranny.
2.
Violent anti-Americanism that has engulfed the world. Because the
phenomenon of “blow-back” is not understood or denied, our foreign
policy is destined to keep us involved in many wars that we have no
business being in. National bankruptcy and a greater threat to our
national security will result.
3. The ease in which we go to
war, without a declaration by Congress, but accepting international
authority from the UN or NATO even for preemptive wars, otherwise known
as aggression.
4. A financial political crisis as a consequence
of excessive debt, unfunded liabilities, spending, bailouts, and gross
discrepancy in wealth distribution going from the middle class to the
rich. The danger of central economic planning, by the Federal Reserve
must be understood.
5. World government taking over local and
US sovereignty by getting involved in the issues of war, welfare, trade,
banking, a world currency, taxes, property ownership, and private
ownership of guns.
Happily, there is an answer for these very dangerous trends.
What a wonderful world it would be if everyone accepted the simple
moral premise of rejecting all acts of aggression. The retort to such a
suggestion is always: it’s too simplistic, too idealistic,
impractical, naïve, utopian, dangerous, and unrealistic to strive for
such an ideal.
The answer to that is that for thousands of
years the acceptance of government force, to rule over the people, at
the sacrifice of liberty, was considered moral and the only available
option for achieving peace and prosperity.
What could be more
utopian than that myth—considering the results especially looking at the
state sponsored killing, by nearly every government during the 20th
Century, estimated to be in the hundreds of millions. It’s time to
reconsider this grant of authority to the state.
No good has
ever come from granting monopoly power to the state to use aggression
against the people to arbitrarily mold human behavior. Such power, when
left unchecked, becomes the seed of an ugly tyranny. This method of
governance has been adequately tested, and the results are in: reality
dictates we try liberty.
The idealism of non-aggression and
rejecting all offensive use of force should be tried. The idealism of
government sanctioned violence has been abused throughout history and is
the primary source of poverty and war. The theory of a society being
based on individual freedom has been around for a long time. It’s time
to take a bold step and actually permit it by advancing this cause,
rather than taking a step backwards as some would like us to do.
Today the principle of habeas corpus, established when King John signed
the Magna Carta in 1215, is under attack. There’s every reason to
believe that a renewed effort with the use of the internet that we can
instead advance the cause of liberty by spreading an uncensored message
that will serve to rein in government authority and challenge the
obsession with war and welfare.
What I’m talking about is a system of government guided by the moral principles of peace and tolerance.
The Founders were convinced that a free society could not exist without
a moral people. Just writing rules won’t work if the people choose to
ignore them. Today the rule of law written in the Constitution has
little meaning for most Americans, especially those who work in
Washington DC.
Benjamin Franklin claimed “only a virtuous
people are capable of freedom.” John Adams concurred: “Our
Constitution was made for a moral and religious people. It is wholly
inadequate to the government of any other.”
A moral people must reject all violence in an effort to mold people’s beliefs or habits.
A society that boos or ridicules the Golden Rule is not a moral
society. All great religions endorse the Golden Rule. The same moral
standards that individuals are required to follow should apply to all
government officials. They cannot be exempt.
The ultimate solution is not in the hands of the government.
The solution falls on each and every individual, with guidance from family, friends and community.
The #1 responsibility for each of us is to change ourselves with hope
that others will follow. This is of greater importance than working on
changing the government; that is secondary to promoting a virtuous
society. If we can achieve this, then the government will change.
It doesn’t mean that political action or holding office has no value.
At times it does nudge policy in the right direction. But what is true
is that when seeking office is done for personal aggrandizement, money
or power, it becomes useless if not harmful. When political action is
taken for the right reasons it’s easy to understand why compromise
should be avoided. It also becomes clear why progress is best achieved
by working with coalitions, which bring people together, without anyone
sacrificing his principles.
Political action, to be truly
beneficial, must be directed toward changing the hearts and minds of the
people, recognizing that it’s the virtue and morality of the people
that allow liberty to flourish.
The Constitution or more laws per se, have no value if the people’s attitudes aren’t changed.
To achieve liberty and peace, two powerful human emotions have to be
overcome. Number one is “envy” which leads to hate and class warfare.
Number two is “intolerance” which leads to bigoted and judgmental
policies. These emotions must be replaced with a much better
understanding of love, compassion, tolerance and free market economics.
Freedom, when understood, brings people together. When tried, freedom is
popular.
The problem we have faced over the years has been
that economic interventionists are swayed by envy, whereas social
interventionists are swayed by intolerance of habits and lifestyles. The
misunderstanding that tolerance is an endorsement of certain
activities, motivates many to legislate moral standards which should
only be set by individuals making their own choices. Both sides use
force to deal with these misplaced emotions. Both are authoritarians.
Neither endorses voluntarism. Both views ought to be rejected.
I have come to one firm conviction after these many years of trying to
figure out “the plain truth of things.” The best chance for achieving
peace and prosperity, for the maximum number of people world-wide, is to
pursue the cause of LIBERTY.
If you find this to be a worthwhile message, spread it throughout the land.
Productivity and creativity are the true source of personal satisfaction. Freedom, and not dependency, provides the environment needed to achieve these goals. Government cannot do this for us; it only gets in the way. When the government gets involved, the goal becomes a bailout or a subsidy and these cannot provide a sense of personal achievement.
Achieving legislative power and political influence should not be our goal. Most of the change, if it is to come, will not come from the politicians, but rather from individuals, family, friends, intellectual leaders and our religious institutions. The solution can only come from rejecting the use of coercion, compulsion, government commands, and aggressive force, to mold social and economic behavior. Without accepting these restraints, inevitably the consensus will be to allow the government to mandate economic equality and obedience to the politicians who gain power and promote an environment that smothers the freedoms of everyone. It is then that the responsible individuals who seek excellence and self-esteem by being self-reliance and productive, become the true victims.
What are the greatest dangers that the American people face today and impede the goal of a free society? There are five.
1. The continuous attack on our civil liberties which threatens the rule of law and our ability to resist the onrush of tyranny.
2. Violent anti-Americanism that has engulfed the world. Because the phenomenon of “blow-back” is not understood or denied, our foreign policy is destined to keep us involved in many wars that we have no business being in. National bankruptcy and a greater threat to our national security will result.
3. The ease in which we go to war, without a declaration by Congress, but accepting international authority from the UN or NATO even for preemptive wars, otherwise known as aggression.
4. A financial political crisis as a consequence of excessive debt, unfunded liabilities, spending, bailouts, and gross discrepancy in wealth distribution going from the middle class to the rich. The danger of central economic planning, by the Federal Reserve must be understood.
5. World government taking over local and US sovereignty by getting involved in the issues of war, welfare, trade, banking, a world currency, taxes, property ownership, and private ownership of guns.
Happily, there is an answer for these very dangerous trends.
What a wonderful world it would be if everyone accepted the simple moral premise of rejecting all acts of aggression. The retort to such a suggestion is always: it’s too simplistic, too idealistic, impractical, naïve, utopian, dangerous, and unrealistic to strive for such an ideal.
The answer to that is that for thousands of years the acceptance of government force, to rule over the people, at the sacrifice of liberty, was considered moral and the only available option for achieving peace and prosperity.
What could be more utopian than that myth—considering the results especially looking at the state sponsored killing, by nearly every government during the 20th Century, estimated to be in the hundreds of millions. It’s time to reconsider this grant of authority to the state.
No good has ever come from granting monopoly power to the state to use aggression against the people to arbitrarily mold human behavior. Such power, when left unchecked, becomes the seed of an ugly tyranny. This method of governance has been adequately tested, and the results are in: reality dictates we try liberty.
The idealism of non-aggression and rejecting all offensive use of force should be tried. The idealism of government sanctioned violence has been abused throughout history and is the primary source of poverty and war. The theory of a society being based on individual freedom has been around for a long time. It’s time to take a bold step and actually permit it by advancing this cause, rather than taking a step backwards as some would like us to do.
Today the principle of habeas corpus, established when King John signed the Magna Carta in 1215, is under attack. There’s every reason to believe that a renewed effort with the use of the internet that we can instead advance the cause of liberty by spreading an uncensored message that will serve to rein in government authority and challenge the obsession with war and welfare.
What I’m talking about is a system of government guided by the moral principles of peace and tolerance.
The Founders were convinced that a free society could not exist without a moral people. Just writing rules won’t work if the people choose to ignore them. Today the rule of law written in the Constitution has little meaning for most Americans, especially those who work in Washington DC.
Benjamin Franklin claimed “only a virtuous people are capable of freedom.” John Adams concurred: “Our Constitution was made for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
A moral people must reject all violence in an effort to mold people’s beliefs or habits.
A society that boos or ridicules the Golden Rule is not a moral society. All great religions endorse the Golden Rule. The same moral standards that individuals are required to follow should apply to all government officials. They cannot be exempt.
The ultimate solution is not in the hands of the government.
The solution falls on each and every individual, with guidance from family, friends and community.
The #1 responsibility for each of us is to change ourselves with hope that others will follow. This is of greater importance than working on changing the government; that is secondary to promoting a virtuous society. If we can achieve this, then the government will change.
It doesn’t mean that political action or holding office has no value. At times it does nudge policy in the right direction. But what is true is that when seeking office is done for personal aggrandizement, money or power, it becomes useless if not harmful. When political action is taken for the right reasons it’s easy to understand why compromise should be avoided. It also becomes clear why progress is best achieved by working with coalitions, which bring people together, without anyone sacrificing his principles.
Political action, to be truly beneficial, must be directed toward changing the hearts and minds of the people, recognizing that it’s the virtue and morality of the people that allow liberty to flourish.
The Constitution or more laws per se, have no value if the people’s attitudes aren’t changed.
To achieve liberty and peace, two powerful human emotions have to be overcome. Number one is “envy” which leads to hate and class warfare. Number two is “intolerance” which leads to bigoted and judgmental policies. These emotions must be replaced with a much better understanding of love, compassion, tolerance and free market economics. Freedom, when understood, brings people together. When tried, freedom is popular.
The problem we have faced over the years has been that economic interventionists are swayed by envy, whereas social interventionists are swayed by intolerance of habits and lifestyles. The misunderstanding that tolerance is an endorsement of certain activities, motivates many to legislate moral standards which should only be set by individuals making their own choices. Both sides use force to deal with these misplaced emotions. Both are authoritarians. Neither endorses voluntarism. Both views ought to be rejected.
I have come to one firm conviction after these many years of trying to figure out “the plain truth of things.” The best chance for achieving peace and prosperity, for the maximum number of people world-wide, is to pursue the cause of LIBERTY.
If you find this to be a worthwhile message, spread it throughout the land.
